It's hard to make the argument that Sylvester Stallone is a genius, but we can certainly learn a lot from him. If you don't believe me, go back and watch the first Rocky movie, or even First Blood (the first Rambo movie). Many people don't know that he wrote both of those movies.
- Rocky - A put upon street thug is given a chance to fight the best boxer in the world, and he doesn't win, but he gos the distance and proves something to himself. One might say that the writing wasn't impressive, since most of the story actually happened in real life. I disagree. I think the script added nuance and depth to a simple idea. The Academy agreed, awarding it Best Picture in 1976.
- First Blood - My friend in high school wrote his term paper for US history about how this movie was the first, real Vietnam released in America. I know nothing about it's cultural significance, but he told me the movie made it ok for people to start talking about what had happened to the vets after they returned. Whether or not this is true, I'm impressed that the film took on such a lofty topic (possible consequences of our training a soldier too well), and handled it with respect, showing both sides of the issue.
I mention these movies and his writing talent because I thought of all that when I read a recent quote from him in a newspaper article (I hate linking to articles, b/c the links die so quickly):
"Every generation runs its course, and they are expected to step aside for the next generation," Stallone said. "My peers are going through it right now, and they feel they have much to contribute, but the opportunity is no longer there. They're considered obsolete, and it's just not true. This film is about how we still have something more to say."
I read this quote and loved it. It's especially interesting when you think about the parallels between Stallone and his character. Found the whole thing inspiring.
And then it came up again, last night, when I went to see "The Queen" with my better half (believe me that I was dragged kicking and screaming to this film). I was expecting a brutal (for me) period piece, with beautiful, effeminate, romantic men, and fancy costumes. I got all of those things (it wasn't a period piece, though), but I was surprised by what I took to be the film's ultimate message:
Most people thought she botched the death of Princess Di, but she was just doing what she was always taught to do, and what would have been expected of her before her generation became irrelevant.
I asked myself if I could sympathize with Stallone and the Queen. Have I been in this situation? I think I have, to a slight extent. I think most people have, if they've ever gone back for their high school or college's Homecoming game within a year or two of graduation. Is there a bigger letdown then these games? You walk around the campus that you used to rule, and you see so many faces that you don't recognize, and the ones you do recognize don't treat you with the same deference they once did, b/c they're in charge now. It's disorienting to realize how quickly one can lose what they've worked long and hard to build up.
I think the lesson is that obsolesce may be inevitable, but our recourse is to keep in touch with our old friends so that the memories don't just live in our heads, and to make as many of these memories as we can while we're young.
I hope that came off as more philosophic than cheesy, but I fear it didn't :-)
Recent Comments